Tuesday, October 19, 2010

My Personality Quiz Results

Qualitative analysis of my personality

 You are:
  • distinctively expressed extravert
  • slightly expressed sensing personality
  • distinctively expressed feeling personality
  • slightly expressed judging personality
                                                       Personality Report

-Your personality stands out when you interact with other people.
-You are more outgoing than the average female is. When people interact with you, they immediately notice that you are not shy about meeting and greeting new people. This is one of the most influential parts of your personality.
-You are somewhat more reactive to your feelings and moods than the average female is. When it comes to emotions, you feel them more intensely than the average female does. This is one of the guiding parts of your personality.
 
Openness to Experience/Intellect
        High scorers tend to be original, creative, curious, complex; Low scorers tend to be conventional, down to earth, narrow interests, uncreative.
         You prefer traditional and familiar experiences.
 
Conscientiousness
        High scorers tend to be reliable, well-organized, self-disciplined, careful; Low scorers tend to be disorganized, undependable, negligent.
         You tend to do things somewhat haphazardly.
 
Extraversion
        High scorers tend to be sociable, friendly, fun loving, talkative; Low scorers tend to be introverted, reserved, inhibited, quiet.
         You are extremely outgoing, social, and energetic.
 
Agreeableness
        High scorers tend to be good natured, sympathetic, forgiving, courteous; Low scorers tend to be critical, rude, harsh, callous.
         You tend to consider the feelings of others.
 
Neuroticism
        High scorers tend to be nervous, high-strung, insecure, worrying; Low scorers tend to be calm, relaxed, secure, hardy.
         You aren't particularly nervous, nor calm.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

My Personality Video :)

Heres the Link!
<object id="vp1DJNw0" width="432" height="240" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000"><param name="movie" value="http://static.animoto.com/swf/w.swf?w=swf/vp1&e=1286990322&f=DJNw04vDcW1HE3V7rHpw6Q&d=148&m=a&r=w&i=m&options="></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed id="vp1DJNw0" src="http://static.animoto.com/swf/w.swf?w=swf/vp1&e=1286990322&f=DJNw04vDcW1HE3V7rHpw6Q&d=148&m=a&r=w&i=m&options=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="432" height="240"></embed></object>

Lobotomist

Walter Freeman was a lobotomist that removes part of a brain in order to solve problems in the brain. I don't think he helped the people that had a lobotomy because Walter didn't really study  how it would work in the long run. The patients were affected and and many had to come back for more lobotomies. Many patients were disabled after the lobotomy and some even died. Areas between the frontal lobe and thalamus was where he performed his surgeries. I don't think he helped people and he just made it worse. I think it was a bad idea and cruel to go into the brain and try to reform it. It affects people differently and everyones different so some lobotomies failed and  some succeeded which is bad because you want them all to succeed and not to fail. Also, Walter did these on his own with no permission which i don't think is okay at all.

Rorschach Ink Blot

My interpretation is of two turkeys! or big seahorses